This paper proposes an interpretation of Books V and VI of Aristotle’s Physics as being (at least partly) a reaction to Zeno’s four “arguments against motion” that Aristotle expounds and discusses in Phys. VI 9. On the basis of a detailed textual analysis of that chapter. I show that Zeno’s arguments rest on a frame of a priori notions such as part and whole. https://hollandscountryclothinges.shop/product-category/board-shorts/